May 11, 2017
Defend the defenders of peoples' rights. Secure, encrypted email: firstname.lastname@example.org (end-to-end encryption)
May 11, 2017
TUN 001 / 0517 / OBS 052
12 mai 2017
L’Observatoire pour la protection des défenseurs des droits de l’Homme, un partenariat de l’Organisation mondiale contre la torture (OMCT) et de la FIDH, vous prie d’intervenir de toute urgence sur la situation suivante en Tunisie.
Description de la situation :
L’Observatoire a été informé de sources fiables de la condamnation à six mois de prison de Me Najet Laabidi, une avocate spécialisée dans la défense des droits de l’Homme et qui a notamment représenté plusieurs victimes de torture devant le Tribunal militaire de Tunis dans le cadre de l’affaire dite de Barraket Essahel.
Selon les informations reçues, le 11 mai 2017, la 8ème chambre correctionnelle du Tribunal de première instance de Tunis a condamné Me Najet Laabidi à six mois de prison pour violation de l’article 128 du Code pénal. Ce verdict est intervenu au terme d’une journée de plaidoiries, le 10 mai 2017, au cours de laquelle plus d’une centaine d’avocats ont représenté Me Laabidi. Me Laabidi a l’intention d’interjeter appel de cette condamnation.
Le 12 octobre 2016, Me Najet Laabidi avait été condamnée par contumace à un an d’emprisonnement en application de l’article 128 du Code pénal, suite à une plainte déposée à son encontre par Mme Leila Hammami, présidente du Tribunal militaire permanent de première instance de Tunis qui était chargée de l’affaire d’opposition de l’ancien directeur de la sûreté de l’Etat Ezzedine Jenaiyeh à son jugement par contumace dans l’affaire Barraket Essahel, en raison de déclarations que Me Najet Laabidi aurait fait le jour de sa convocation par le juge d’instruction au sein du Tribunal militaire pour une plainte déposée à son encontre par la même magistrate (cf. rappel des faits). Informée de ce jugement le 24 avril 2017, Me Laabidi a alors fait opposition de ce verdict qui avait été prononcé par contumace, et l’audience d’opposition a été fixée au 10 mai 2017.
May 11, 2017
A Toronto criminal defence lawyer who was shot outside his law office last September says Halton police officers didn’t act fast enough to apprehend what was clearly a “very dangerous” man.
On the afternoon of Sept. 20, J. Randall Barrs was standing beside his Mercedes parked outside his Bedford Road office when he was shot twice by a man wearing a construction vest and a blonde wig.
Seconds later, the man in the disguise was shot by an undercover Halton police officer while he attempted to flee.
Both Barrs and the suspect recovered from their injuries.
On Wednesday, the province’s Special Investigations Unit cleared the Halton officer involved in the incident, saying he was “acting in the course of his duties” when he fired at the suspect.
In its decision, the SIU revealed that 51-year-old Grayson Delong was being monitored by a team of Halton police officers since 9 a.m. that day, after he made a court appearance in Brampton.
May 12, 2017
Chinese human rights lawyer Li Heping, who was released from detention and rejoined his family earlier this week, is still able to smile and remains optimistic despite enduring about 60 days in solitary confinement and years of ill-treatment in custody, according to his friends.
Li, 46, was sent home to rejoin his wife and daughter in Beijing on Tuesday after he was convicted of subversion of state power last month.
Li was handed down a three-year suspended prison sentence at a closed-door court hearing, but had already spent years in custody – more than 600 days in total –after he was detained in the sweeping “709 crackdown” on human rights lawyers that began in July 2015.
Some 300 human rights defenders were detained during the campaign.
Li gained prominence representing political dissidents in China, including the blind legal activist Chen Guangcheng, rights attorney Gao Zhisheng and members of the Falun Gong spiritual movement, which is banned on the mainland.
His sentence allowed for his release, but he will be unable to practise law in the near future.
Li, who is a Christian, weighed only 51kg after his release, his friends said.
He spent more than 10 days putting on weight before he returned home to his family, according to friends who met him this week.
“Li is gentle, strong and optimistic,” said one friend, Li Fangping.
“He survived unspeakable cruelty in those 600-plus days, including having his wrists bound together with his ankles 24/7 for more than a month. Yet we don’t see hatred in his eyes.
“He couldn’t recognise himself when he looked in the mirror … his hair was all white and he had aged a lot, along with the dramatic weight loss in those two years,” his friend said.
May 11, 2017
As Syrian Christians who grew up in Syria, we would beg to differ. Hundreds of innocent Christians seeking freedom have been tortured to death in Assad’s jails or shot to death by his brutal thugs – including the activist Bassel Shehadeh, who was killed at a protest, then killed in spirit because Assad forces prevented his friends from going to church to pray for his soul. Human rights lawyer Khalil Maatouk has been detained in Assad’s jails in Damascus for over four years for the “crime” of defending detainees in Assad’s jails.
These anecdotes are not new and are not isolated incidents.
May 11, 2017
China Desk is a regular round-up of the voices and issues that may have been overlooked in the day-to-day reporting of Chinese affairs.
In this first edition of Newshour’s China Desk: The BBC’s John Sudworth speaks to Wang Qiaoling, wife of the human rights lawyer Li Heping, who was detained by the Chinese authorities in 2015. She alleges that her husband was severely tortured by the Chinese authorities during his detention. Earlier this week Li Heping was given a suspended prison sentence, and returned home for the first time since his arrest.
(Photo: Wang Qiaoling, the wife of detained lawyer Li Heping, poses for a photograph in Beijing. Credit: FRED DUFOUR/AFP/Getty Images)
May 10, 2017
Des efforts ont été faits, mais ils restent insuffisants. C’est le message de Me Nico Halle. Le président de l’Assemblée générale de l’ordre des avocats du Cameroun, dans La Nouvelle Expression (LNE) parue le 8 mai 2017, donne son avis sur l’évolution de la crise sociopolitique qui secoue le Nord-Ouest et Sud-Ouest depuis environ 7 mois.
L’homme de droit salue d’abord les mesures annoncées et mises par le gouvernement en signe de réponse à certaines revendications. Notamment le rétablissement d’internet. « Il faut saluer à juste titre cette marque d’attention de Paul Biya et cela indique tout simplement la volonté de trouver des solutions pour une sortie de crise », se félicite-t-il.
Me Halle redoute cependant que ces mesures ne soient insuffisantes pour ramener le calme et l’apaisement. « Toutes les discussions qui seront menées jusqu’ici sans la libération totale de tous ceux qui ont été mis en prison sans exception, sont vouées à l’échec », ajoute l’avocat.
De son point de vue, la solution est simple : « un arrêt des poursuites. Le Président de la République seul peut ordonner la libération sans condition de tous les détenus, ce qui permettra à tous les acteurs cachés ou en exil de revenir au dialogue. Et si cela parait compliquer, le président Biya peut aussi introduire un projet de loi ordonnant de signer l’amnistie générale à tous ceux qui sont poursuivis dans le cadre de cette affaire. Il faut faire dans la session de juin 2017. Pour qu’il soit couvert lui-même ».
May 11, 2017
Ever since the Supreme Court of India passed the order on 9th May, 2017 of arrest of Justice C.S. Karnan, a judge of the Calcutta High Court, he has been rendered untraceable. Since the Supreme Court order had put press censorship of sorts,rumours are afloat about Justice Karnan’s whereabouts. A disinformation campaign has been launched in the mainstream media to the effect that Justice Karnan is in Tamilnadu one moment and Andhra Pradesh the next; that he has fled the country and gone to Nepal or even Bangladesh. He is being painted as a fugitive on the run. Naturally there are fears in the minds of all democratically minded human rights activists about the wellbeing of Justice C.S. Karnan who has every right to defend himself legally even at this stage.
Pertinently since he had been championing the cause of action against corruption in the higher judiciary and had been openly petitioning to various authorities on the issue he would naturally become a marked man. The vested interest would naturally like to exploit the circumstances in which Justice Karnan finds himself. All efforts should be made to ensure his safety. After all Justice Karnan ostensibly has the evidence of corruption against the higher judiciary. Additionally the extreme public humiliation faced by Justice Karnan may create a situation whereby he may be forced to end his life.
May 11, 2017
Five judges who were dismissed from profession with decrees issued by the Turkish government in the aftermath of a coup attempt on July 15, 2016, were arrested on Thursday.
According to Cumhuriyet daily, the five judges, who were detained on Friday, testified to a court in Antalya, which handed down the arrest decision for “coup plotting” and “membership in a terrorist organization,” in reference to the Gülen movement. Detention warrants had been issued for the judges over their alleged links to the movement.
Over 145,000 people, including over 4,272 judges and prosecutors, have been purged from state jobs in Turkey due to their alleged ties with the Gülen movement, which the Turkish government also accuses of being behind the failed coup on July 15, 2016.
Turkey survived a failed military coup attempt on July 15, 2016 that killed over 240 people. Immediately after the putsch, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government along with Turkey’s autocratic President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan pinned the blame on the Gülen movement despite the lack of any evidence to that effect.