Daily Archives: 07/02/2016

Turkey: Uğur Yeşiltepe bâtonnier du Barreau Tunceli 6 ans et 3 mois de prison de prison pour appartenance présumée à un parti se livrant à des » actes terroristes «

Tunceli Baro Başkanı Uğur Yeşiltepe’ye Maoist Komünist Partisi (MKP) üyeliği iddiasıyla verilen 6 yıl 3 aylık hapis cezası onandı

 

http://www.idhae.org/observatoire-fr-page4.1.turk16010200.htm

http://www.iapl.net/index.php/news-statements/88-iapl-protests-the-turkish-government-and-stands-with-ugur-yesiltepe-a-people-s-lawyer-arrested-on-assumptive-grounds

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/bar-head-sentenced-to-six-years-for-participation-in-rallies.aspx?pageID=238&nID=77175&NewsCatID=341

Dominican Republic: Colegio de Abogados pide esclarecimiento del asesinato del abogado en Moca

2/2/16

Presidente electo Colegio Abogados auditará finanzas del gremio;  no descarta acciones legales

El presidente del Colegio de Abogados, Miguel Surún Hernández,reclamó hoy de las autoridades judiciales y de la Policía Nacional disponer de las más profundas y transparentes investigaciones que den al traste con el esclarecimiento de los culpables y las circunstancias en que fue asesinado el doctor Juan Pablo Vicente, encontrado muerto en el municipio de Moca.

“El Colegio de Abogados reclama una profunda rápida y transparente investigación que esclarezca dicho crimen, así como que le sean impuesto el más severo castigo para el o los culpables del hecho”, expresó Surún Hernández.

El doctor Juan Pablo Vicente había desaparecido desde hace varios días, provocando la desesperación de sus colegas y sus familiares.

http://www.cdn.com.do/noticias/2016/02/02/colegio-de-abogados-pide-esclarecimiento-del-asesinato-del-abogado-en-moca/

China: Six Months On, An Assessment of the July 9 Arrest of Lawyers in China

January 28, 2016

逮捕证拼图15张

A summary of the situation

After six months of “residential surveillance at a designated place” (in reality forced disappearance), the vast majority of the human rights lawyers and other activists who lost their freedom in the “July 9 incident” [16 in all] have been formally arrested by the Communist Party on charges of “subverting state power,” or “inciting subversion of state power.” Even after family members and defense lawyers finally found where they were being held, the authorities continued to refuse visits—on the one hand, they claimed that visitation would endanger national security, and on the other claimed that the detained individuals had engaged new lawyers, dismissing those hired by family. Further, only a very few family members have been allowed to go to the detention centers and deposit living expenses for the detained lawyers.

The precursor to “subversion” or “inciting subversion” was “counterrevolutionary crimes” — a crime of a political character, or political persecution. When the Communist Party was revising the Criminal Law, it was a tailor-made provision for human rights defenders, and dissidents who opposed the Party’s dictatorship. Often, it allows the criminalization of speech. Since the 1980s, when Deng Xiaoping established his rule, the Communist Party has resorted to very little use of these sorts of politically-defined crimes to punish political activists or prisoners of conscience (with the exception of its imprisonment of activists around the June 4 incident, or the key figures who led or took part in organizing opposition parties in the 1990s). In particular after Liu Xiaobo won the Nobel Peace Prize, the authorities carefully combed through the Criminal Law to find some non-political crimes to hang on political dissidents: for instance, the crime of “disorderly behavior,” originally classified as “hooliganism,” or “illegal business operations,” which was adapted from the old crime of “speculation and profiteering.” They did this in an attempt to avoid creating heroes through political suppression.

Six Months On, An Assessment of the July 9 Arrest of Lawyers in China